Talk:Negima! Magister Negi Magi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

why is it rated m[edit]

i have now idea why its rated mature could someone please tell me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.0.207 (talk) 21:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

due to the huge amount of fan service perhaps? 99.123.198.224 (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what is this?[edit]

I found this in Chinese manga site while trying to find ch 350(see if the Chinese one was released cause the English one was not) http://www.dm5.com/m96893-p4/ Now, where does this come from? and what is this categorized under? I can't find either the English nor the Japanese counterpart. Is this "official" stuff? is there more stuff of this kind? Any Negima experts know? 99.123.198.224 (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's the "volume 0" that supposedly came with the Negima Anime Final movie. I don't know if it's truly canon though because some parts from the movie were said to have changed from the original manga. Jcdizon (talk) 00:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why no mention of the controversy?[edit]

The plot involves sexual innuendo between a child and an adult. Why no mention of the controversy? — TheHerbalGerbil(TALK|STALK), 03:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any reliable sources to back that kind of section up?ggctuk (2005) (talk) 05:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there really a controversy? And as Ggctuk stated, you need reliable sources to support that there is one. —Farix (t | c) 13:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Negima! Magister Negi Magi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]