Talk:Netflix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleNetflix was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 30, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
July 28, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Requested move 18 December 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:SNOW (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 12:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)



NetflixNetflix Inc. – The page will talk about how the Netflix company fits into Inc. As it is hard to read about the company itself (or the streaming service) only, this article should be only about Netflix Inc. while there should a new article about the streaming service. Also, this article is too long, as it is about both of them. — HoneymoonAve27 (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  • Oppose per WP:NCCORP saying, "Convention: The legal status suffix of a company (such as Inc., plc, LLC, and those in other languages such as GmbH, AG, and S.A.) is not normally included in the article title." If the article is too long, then the extended business or streaming-service content can be WP:SPLIT into a sub-article with a summary section left behind. I do not see a move as a solution here. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Oppose per above, although EB uses "Netflix-Inc" in the URL it uses plain "Netflix" in the title and notes "Netflix, Inc." as an alternative title. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Oppose per the above. Netflix is also the WP:COMMONNAME. BD2412 T 20:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Oppose per the above. The problem is that much of the news about the company is also news about its streaming service, so it's very difficult to cleanly disentangle them. I see only three sections that wouldn't overlap: the early history of Netflix when it was a DVD-by-mail service, the corporate culture part (which relates solely to the company), and the awards given to the streaming service. Everything else would overlap so we would end up with two overlapping articles which would be impossible to maintain properly. We already have hundreds of such disasters on Wikipedia and no one has the time, energy, or interest to fix them. --Coolcaesar (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per WP:COMMONNAME.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Oppose per all the above. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kibble[edit]

So... apparently... according to Marc Randolph, he initially called Netflix "Kibble". https://www.quora.com/How-did-anyone-come-up-with-the-name-Netflix

Is this worth adding to the article?