Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir is part of the Neverwinter Nights 2 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 19, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
December 9, 2009 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Video games (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has had a peer review which is now archived.
WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Forgotten Realms work group.


Most of this article is an advertisement, so I shall delete most of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

And I have cleaned it up and restored most of the information. While it was obviously copy/pasted from a press release, it was still valid information. There is no reason to vandalize the article twice. KiTA (talk) 04:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


This article is very out of date. It refers to the game as though it was not yet released. Is there any way to add a tag to the article that says that? It could use a reception section as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by71.245.122.35 (talk) 20:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The voice acting was widely panned, but the music was praised. → Rewrite the sentence without passive voice and with more information.
    Good. MuZemike 05:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
    That is, per [1]. MuZemike 05:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The last two sentences in the second paragraph in the Plot section is unsourced (After some difficulty, they also manage to open a portal to the Sword Coast, allowing them to find Crossroad Keep and establish it as a base of operations for their growing trade empire. Sa'Sani instructs the party to establish outposts in nearby towns and forge ties with various merchant guilds in Neverwinter.). The last part of the Plot section is also unsourced (after the last given citation). Please reference.
I won't be able to do this; I don't have access to the game. — Levi van Tine (tc) 02:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Put in a request at the WP Video Games talk page? BOZ (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I'll look into it, too. I mean, I absolutely do not want to fail on the basis on a pair of unsourced sections when everything else looks very good. Just as in Neverwinter Nights 2, there might be something in the official strategy guide that would at the least provide some verifiability behind those sections. It might also help to look more into those sources above and below the unsourced content to see if you can include something that maybe wasn't earlier. If you're going to remove content, make sure it still follows logically per the sources given. That's some suggestions. MuZemike 07:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Good enough. I removed the first passage altogether and did some combining. I also added a {{fact}} tag at the end to indicate that you need to source it. Any print source (i.e. a guide) should verify this. MuZemike 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A couple of the images are not of low-resolution, a requirement per WP:NFCC; the gameplay images have already been tagged for speedy deletion—not good. I cannot do anything about it right now, but I'll try to fix this up later for you with my own image-editing software.
    If your wondering how big an image can be check here, it says 400x300 is fine. Is that still applicable? Salavat (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
    At the higher levels, people have been cracking down harder on this, so it might be something to discuss at WT:VG. I reduced them to 256px (which is still larger than the default size with thumbnails) while still preserving .1 megapixel resolution. Is this OK? MuZemike 15:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
    After looking at the poor quality of one of them, I bumped both screenshots up to 300px (the largest default width for thumbnails and per WP:MOS#Images) that doesn't have the dithering as before. MuZemike 15:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
    300 looks to be a good size, i believe that screenshots need to be large enough in order to provide some insight which a 200px thumb cant show while at the same time holding within the lines of non-free rules. Salavat (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
    A good point of reference for guidance is Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-09-22/Dispatches in regards to non-free image use (many examples cited are video game images). Actually, that makes me want to go back and redo all the other images I've non-free reduced :( . Anyways, this is good. MuZemike 16:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Overall:
    Placed on hold until necessary corrections are made. MuZemike 21:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
    Passed. MuZemike 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! :) BOZ (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for help[edit]

Hy, can someone help me with this, i install the las Expansion( Storm of zehir) and now get stuck in the original campaing in the tavern. the moment when i go to the door to change my party it crash. Help please!!! Sardy —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 09:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, Wikipedia is not a forum. I suggest you ask at the official developer's forums instead. Regards SoWhy 09:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Improving references[edit]

I have added a "RefImprove" tag because lots of current references have broken links in them. Do NOT simply delete the dead links - most can be recovered! I do not have time to recover them right now, but you can do it yourself - read the WP:BADLINK on how to use WebArchive to recover them and see what I did to Neverwinter Nights 2: Mask of the Betrayer. (talk) 02:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the other page. (talk) 05:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Neverwinter Nights 2: Storm of Zehir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)