Talk:New Jersey Route 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article New Jersey Route 21 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
January 7, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
This article has a map. If the map has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
This article has been recognized in the following venues:
Ellipse sign blank.svg
This article was the selected article of the New Jersey task force in February 2014.
WikiProject New Jersey (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Nice job. Needs more though.

  1. Sourcing
  2. Major junctions
  3. and whatever you can think of.Mitchazenia(7600+edits) 20:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 21/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. Lead: Downtown should be lowercase. RD: "At milepost 0.22, the route interchanges with Interstate 78 ." - fix period. Downtown again. "with which it forms a concurrency with.[1]" - no second "with". My main concern for section 1.2 is that it's basically the junction table in prose. Would it be possible to add other details that are not apparent from the junction table? History: Downtown again. What river was rerouted? "dumped" seems a bit too colloquial. So does talk.
  2. Remove cite from lead. History 2nd par: combine last 2 cites.
  3. Neutral, stable, images good.

On hold See concerns above. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Passing. --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

USRD GA audit[edit]

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done. Dough4872 (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


What is all this construction between Exit 5 and 3rd Ave in Newark? When did it start? When is it supposed to end? It seems like it has been going on forever.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)