From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.


I note that the article has been marked by a notability template without a proper text in this talk page. Why is it not notable? For the reason of mechanically applying a policy? While reliable secondary sources is a good thing, the fact that I surfed to here in order to find an alternative to the bloated malformed C98 libc is an indication of the inherent notability of the article ― one might reasonably wish to have 2ndary sources on topics in general in WP. However: for software, this shouldn't be erected a requirement in order to allow the article a continuing existence, because the software users tend to communicate with the primary source of the software, and otherwise be almost silent. I believe the notability policy should be executed by a certain care as regards to software, so in order to provocate awareness of this care, I'm now, without searching consensus, provocatively going to remove the notability template. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 18:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Spelling of the subject of this article[edit]

Is it "newlib" or "Newlib"? Both are currently used. --Mortense (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Newlib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)