From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Seems this article too has been taken over by Soka Gakkai. Just for the note, Dai-Shonin is not a title used by all schools – extremely unprofessional behaviour by the editors that is … remaining diplomatic it’s simply NICHIREN. The picture used resembles a kong fu film /rock - star – not only unprofessional but pathetic that is. Also missing are the titles that were bestowed upon Nichiren by the imperial court – you guys simply deleted them. Reading the article turns from foul, unprofessional, pathetic to simply sad. Sad would be the best to describe the life state of those who caused that. -- (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC) The picture of Nichiren even resembles Ikeda --- good grief. What’s wrong with you guys??-- (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Right, Nichiren are not what such Great Sage (Dai-Shonin). Regarding about the image, is nothing wrong on it, but it should be resized back in 200px. Long time ago, Nichiren Shoshu and Soka Gakkai was the same organized religion, so there is no any rare to Daisaku Ikeda opinion. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

It is believed, especially in Nichiren Shoshu[edit]

I removed the word "especially." I do not see evidence that groups outside of Nichiren Shoshu believe this. BrandenburgG (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

No issue, there is an vast believed from Soka Gakkai and not just only the groups from Nichiren Shoshu. Some of the schools are even still described Nichiren the fake appellation as so-called Great Sage (Daishonin), this may lets people feel perplexedly on that instructive, based from the sources information at outside. SA 13 Bro (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nichiren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the dead link fix. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


I am no registered user, but how on earth can somebody be so malicious and delete names in quotes and even book titles???? Is this not a case of vandalism? Please have a look at this: [1]. The editor who has done this is still editing?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@ Who vandalism? I am also a vandal fighter in Wikipedia. I am actually want to have the conversation chats with that IP editor at here about the issue just now, but I didn't received any response until now. May I know, are you also that IP editor? SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

What goes through someone’s mind when changing the wording of citations and even book titles? That is sick. Somebody must have been on a Daishonin-hunt there. The book is called ‘The Writings of Nichiren Daishonin’ NOT ‘The Writings of Nichiren’, Causton’s book title is not ‘Buddha in Daily Life, An Introduction to the Buddhism of Nichiren’ but ‘Buddha in Daily Life, An Introduction to the Buddhism of Nichiren Daishonin’, in another CITATION (!!!) it does not say ‘disciples’ but ‘Bodhisattvas’. With all due respect one can (may or should) disagree with SGI’s teachings, but changing the content of published material and even book titles is slightly schizophrenic. If this is not vandalism I have no idea what is. I am a reader (not an editor) who now and again turns to Wikipedia and noticed this by coincidence – this questions the reliability of this text and the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@ Just read the WP:NOTEVERYTHING, I doesn't want to argument about the vandalism topic with you, writing the honorific about Nichiren due to respect one each other by the disciples, for what it worth? Encyclopedic content is also WP:NOTMEMORIAL site. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@ talk You are willingly lying and falsifying information – are you aware of that? You are discrediting Wikipedia. If any registered editor reads this I hope they know what to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@ I am lying what? SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Note: This IP range has been global blocked for 1 day by DerHexer due to a LTA vandal. SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[edit]

I am also hope you don't adding this person into article on any topics as well, he was actually the devil king of sixth heaven, and not the imaginative as some of the IP editors mind is thinking about that he was so sincere to be Nichiren one of the disciple. SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Page move request[edit]

Can this page please be moved to Nichiren Daishonin? Thank you! SportsFan007 (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007

@SportsFan007: Actually, Nichiren’s full name was not Nichiren Daishonin. Just for the note that "DaiShonin" is not a title used by all schools which mentioned by the IP editor on above at here, why do you go and remove the redirected content from here? SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@SA 13 Bro: I undid my change on the redirect. Also, He was referred to as Nichiren Daishonin, not Nichiren. All the books with his writings say Nichiren Daishonin. SportsFan007 (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007

Why is incorrect information being reinserted repeatedly?[edit]

It’s not “The Major Writings of Nichiren”, but “The Major Writings of Nichiren Daishonin” – published by SGI/Nichiren Shoshu

It’s not “The Writings of Nichiren”, but “The Writings of Nichiren Daishonin” – published by SGI

It’s not “Writings of Nichiren”, but “Writings of Nichiren Shonin” – published by Nichiren Shu

I could not find any source that refers to Nichiren as “Dai-Nichiren”, but sources that refer to Nichiren as Nichiren Shonin, Nichiren Daishonin, Nichiren Daibosatsu, Rissho Daishi or simply Rissho. Why are people lying and getting away with it?-- (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

It’s an old name used in Japan. At the Head temple in Taisekiji they sometimes refer to it as Dai nichiren, in Kitayama as well they use it. (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Can any body else tell me that when they will continuing to use the old name? SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Would you, SA 13 Bro, please be so kind and enlighten a well-disposed reader what the old names are? In what position are you to determine names, mentioned in literature, as old vs new? -- (talk) 19:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Also. Is there any resource were one is able to look up the new names compared with the old names as used in literature?-- (talk) 19:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Honestly, the Japanese imperial court was actually the fascism. The new name is a libel, which did by among of corruption monks from Nichiren Shoshu temple and the corruption Minoru Harada from SGI as well, I hope you all would realize on that. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The SGI is absolutely not corrupted!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007
Daisaku Ikeda is a great universe man in SGI, and I trusted him. But for Minoru Harada is a corruption president leader; he is! SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Dai Nichiren[edit]

I found some lead about Nichiren is Dai Nichiren like this, this, there was a eBook document author by Daisaku Ikeda said that it was the Writings of Nichiren, and didn't said that it was the Writings of Nichiren Daishonin. Could some one have a view and comment on that? SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Image are using by google as well![edit]

I can't understand why some people want to change the photo, the image are used by the google search as well. And also, why some of the fellows like to keep persistently appellation Nichiren full name as Nichiren Daishonin? Not every school are using that title! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Could please don't?[edit]

Could somebody else please stop adding the full name Nichiren Daishonin on it? Yes, there was some certain information based on the sources from outside, but not every schools are using that full name title, one of the IP editor also commented on above at here in previously. Encyclopedic content are not everything such as like the useful honorific full name for disciples appellation due to respect one each other as per WP:NOTEVERYTHING, here is also WP:NOTMEMORIAL site as well. Could please don't making the POV pushing, what such censorship and ownership kind of commenting? Thank you for your cooperation. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


Since nobody knows for sure what Nichiren looked like – in most parts he is pictured as a rather stocky person in historic works of art - it might be a good idea to simply include no picture of him at all as an alternative?? To my mind the picture in the article resembles far too much young Daisaku Ikeda, I find that a bit over the top – tacky actually. -- (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I have already provided the reliable source for Nichiren image, believe it or not is up to your faith. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)