Talk:No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 19, 2014.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 20:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Review

  • According to the toolbox, it's possible there's a better link for "Canopy believed cause of Sabre pilot deaths (info) [nla.gov.au]".
    • Interesting, the automated dab checker didn't send me a reminder this time... ;-)
  • "{"The Young Shall Have Wings")": ("The Young Shall Have Wings")
    • Tks -- surprised it didn't draw attention to itself by clobbering the infobox, temperamental things they are...!
  • "During the war it had graduated 1,247 pilots, losing 45 students in fatal accidents.": This question is actually about a current FAC and not this article ... have you heard anyone claim before that "losing" is in the wrong tense in BritEng?
    • Don't know about BritEng per se but it's common wordage when discussing casualties, certainly in the Commonwealth-focussed sources I use.
  • Two images are missing.
    • Missing... what...? :-)
      • The links to the images were broken ... they're fine now. - Dank (push to talk)
  • "Sabre Trials Flight. The flight was responsible": I'd prefer the reader get some kind of clue here that this is not the usual meaning of "flight"
  • "in the shape of": I'd prefer "in the form of"
    • Well I'd hope to avoid the "formation ... form" repetition...
  • "frontline", "front-line" (as an adjective): consistency. FWIW, AmEng is "frontline".
    • Tks, thought I had 'em all -- I think we generally say "front line" for the compound noun, in which case "front-line" would be the expected adjectival usage. Tks for reviewing! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    - Dank (push to talk) 20:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Passed - Dank (push to talk) 01:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quick service! Many tks Dan. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)