Talk:No. 421 (Reconnaissance) Flight RAF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

References for source material for 421 Flight article[edit]

Mattbryantuk

I'd like to say that this is an excellently written article, and from the degree of specialist knowledge I have about it, it should score highly on accuracy. Would it be possible please for you to cite your source material in References and Citations? It seems that if you don't, there's a danger that the article will be removed, which would be a great pity. The only other source material I'm aware of for 421 Flight is a lengthy and well-researched article in Aviation News in October 1984, a copy of which I have in my possession but I haven't had time at present to go back to this and add anything from it.

Regards,

Geoffhl (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 421 (Reconnaissance) Flight RAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)