Talk:Nobuhiko Takada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I have amended the page back to its state before Freedom Skies last edit. Freedom skies has appeared to revert the page back to his last amendment disregarding the additional content and spelling corrections that have been added to the article since his previous changes. If he has an issue with the content added he should make this clear and discuss it rather than simply revert the page to his own subjective opinions. The content I have added are simply an acknowledgement of opinions widely shared throughout the mma community (I invite anyone to search the topic at Sherdog.com, arguably the largest resource on mma) and Takada has supposedly admitted the worked matches in his own book, however due to translation issues and my inability to find a hard copy I have not included this in the article.

If there is a problem with acknowledging a widely held view (which I in no way respresent as a fact) then Freedom Skies should certainly not be stating his own opinions (such as that Takada established himself as a legend in MMA history, many regard his fights as a disgrace to the sport or that matches which many see as laughable such as that vs Filipovic were shows of strength and resilience) as facts on the topic. -Trollheim

Transition to MMA[edit]

"Though Takada was originally brought in to attract fans, the show lack of skill and fighting spirit made the japanese public boo Takada in his later performances. Sakuraba will carry Pride status of local star while Takada will be forgoten."

What is this garbage? I'm not debating it's truth, but this desperately needs some references and fixing.

Edgar 05:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fixed Fight?[edit]

Well I was looking some videos on YouTube and everyone was 100% sure that his fight against Coleman was fixed. Does anyone have some kind of reference about this? Yet Inue (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coleman issue[edit]

Since this fight was revealed by the organization as fixed, why is it even on his pro record? --JY23 (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED FIGHTS[edit]

Why were all references to the fixed nature of all of Takada's mma "fights" removed from this article? Unless someone can explain why that information about Takada's only wins is irrelevant to an article about an alleged mma fighter, I will revert the deletions.  Mr JM  01:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I did not remove it but if there were allegations of fixed fights without Reliable Sources then that is contentious material and should be removed from all Biographies of Living People (WP:BLP) on sight, not tagged, not questioned but removed until there are reliable sources for it. So don't revert, source.  MPJ -US  18:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Why is there comments like this in there: "Though Takada's submission wrestling skills were never doubted either by the Japanese public or the matchmakers, it was his conditioning that would make the essential difference." No mention of the pitiful Bernardo fight. Too much praise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.52.34 (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Nobuhiko Takada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]