Talk:North Acropolis, Tikal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 14:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Will review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Lead

• aound -typo

• Fixed. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

• "the tombs of Yax Nuun Ayiin I, Siyaj Chan K'awiil II, Wak Chan K'awiil and "Animal Skull"." dates of rule or burial in brackets after each would be useful here.

• Done. Simon Burchell (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• My feeling is that you need to elaborate more on the monuments to effectively summarize the article.

• Done. Simon Burchell (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Late preclassic

• Wikilink Late Preclassic .

• Done. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Postclassic

• Strange to begin section with "However".

• I've cut the "however". Simon Burchell (talk) 21:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Structures

• No estimated dates for construction date of 27-31?

• I've dropped in some dates; in some cases this is pretty vague since not all of these structures have been excavated. Simon Burchell (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Burial 48

• The king wwas -typo

• Fixed. Simon Burchell (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

plaster of paris

Paris is capitalized in the dictionary for plaster of Paris I believe.

• Of course it is... fixed it! Simon Burchell (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Looks in good shape overall, most interesting, especially the red painted skull.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review - I've fixed the simple stuff and will come back and do the rest tomorrow. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

OK, I think I've dealt with everything - if not, please let me know. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

That's great - many thanks! All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)