This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
The article Northern Ireland, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2007 Arbitration case, and amended by community consensus in 2008, 2009, and 2012. The current restrictions are:
All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related.
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring.
Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. When in doubt, don't revert!
Mabuska, why have you piped the soccer team? What's the point? Gob Lofa (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The only edit that is odd and defies Wikipedia standards is your own Gob Lofa. You reverted my alterations to your subtle POV pushing, as well as my removal of tautology which you seem happy to insist enforcing on the article. It is no skin off my nose so I have made no fuss about my alterations being reverted, however I reverted your imposition of your alterations as you have no agreement for them and are simply POV pushing and slow edit-warring.
On those points, the very basis of this topic is redundant and utterly pointless and serves no purpose. Maybe discuss your own odd edit... Mabuska(talk) 11:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
You didn't answer my questions. What point of view do you believe I pushed? Gob Lofa (talk) 12:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Your job to make the case for change Gob Lofa ----SnowdedTALK 12:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
OK. I'd like to unpipe the link to the soccer team. I can't see why it ought to be piped. Gob Lofa (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
You'd like to, Mabuska prefers the existing wording and on the face of it so do I. But I'm open to an argument to change it. ----SnowdedTALK 14:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I support the pipe linking. We don't need to mention Northern Ireland more than once in a sentence. The full team article title feels clunky when used in the sentence, the piped version flows better and doesn't feel like it's an easter egg link as it's obvious what it's discussing. Canterbury Tailtalk 15:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Why describe Best as a Northern Irish footballer rather than a Northern Ireland footballer? Many Northern Irish footballers play for the Republic, so I find your wording confusing. Gob Lofa (talk) 12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Redundant argument. The few not many Northern Irish footballers that play for the Republic have chosen Irish as they identity and nationality. All that is needed to state for them is that they are Irish footballers from Northern Ireland. Northern Irish clearly suggests Northern Ireland. Simple. Mabuska(talk) 19:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Neither of you seems to have thought this through. Try to avoid this next time. Gob Lofa (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Actually Gob Lofa it is you who hasn't thought this through. My original edit which you reverted with your spurious "?" edit summary, a revert where you restored your edit that was objected to and duly reverted again by myself by restoring the article to the stable version before yours or my contested version. I never yapped or complained about your revert, and my original post in this topic stands as true as the day I typed it.
But seeing as we're here "discussing", clearly explain what was wrong with my original edit? Where are the exact problems? Or was it simply as always... a knee-jerk revert hoping to entice an adverse reaction? You claimed the edit was odd yet the edit smmary for it is as descriptive as you'll get for most edits on this site by many editors. Mabuska(talk) 19:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Why not just 'Northern Ireland', then there's no confusion? Your opposition seems unusually staunch. Gob Lofa (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
If there is confusion prove it. Your bias and POV on the issue of the term Northern Irish amongst other terms describing Northern Ireland is well known and only detracts from your arguments.
Also you have failed to respond to the question I posed... what was wrong with my edit? Nothing. Mabuska(talk) 18:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
IRA terror campaigns against Northern Ireland prior to 1960s
Apparently even mentioning these warrants a "PoV edit" by the dominant Irish Nationalist contributors here (and the bias in the narrative in any of the historical sections really shows). IrishBriton (talk) 19:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Us second class citizens can't edit everything so can some remove the Londonderry link from the subheading "Cities and towns by population" as per WP:DERRY. Can't imagine a link lasting that long for County Derry..................Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
I've asked Canterbury Tail to sort this and I'm sure it will be done in line with guidelines ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
This is the last place that incorrectly links to L'Derry. FIX IT..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 22:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
I've just corrected that. The problem with Londonderry to Derry for the city is that it's actually difficult to identify cases where it's been changed, whereas finding references to County Derry is pretty easy. It's a limitation and complication of searching unfortunately. However it's been corrected now that it's been pointed out. Canterbury Tailtalk 11:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
I have just modified 4 external links on Northern Ireland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: