Talk:Norton Internet Security

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Norton Internet Security has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Norton Internet Security:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Norton Internet Security/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviewing this article shortly. Techman224Talk 23:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

What is a good article?[edit]

A good article is— </noinclude>

  1. Well written: Green tickY
    (a) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; Green tickY and
    (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.Green tickY
  2. Verifiable with no original research: Green tickY
    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;Green tickY
    (b) all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; Green tickY and
    (c) it contains no original research. Green tickY
  3. Broad in its coverage: Green tickY
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Green tickY and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) Green tickY.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Green tickY
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Green tickY
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Green tickY
    (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; Green tickY and
    (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Green tickY


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Norton Internet Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)