Talk:Nuclear energy policy
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclear energy policy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 | |||
| WikiProject Energy | (Rated B-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization: |
 | Material from Nuclear energy policy was split to Nuclear energy policy by country on 6 August 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
 | A fact from Nuclear energy policy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 17 August 2005. The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
|  |
 | This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Contents
Naming[edit]
There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Contrary to popular belief, Civilan Nuclear reactors are in fact the single most successful non-proliferation agent in the world[edit]
As per my recent edits to the proliferation section, which was severely biased and skewed, and prior to my edit didn't even mention the Megatons to Megawatts program. So I've injected some reality into the article.
Let me know what you think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boundarylayer (talk • contribs) 21:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
FYI, screwy redirect[edit]
Readers here might be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Nuclear_power_phase-out_talk_page_is_erroneously_redirected NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
It is already fixed.
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nuclear energy policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS101123+06-May-2009+BW20090506 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925194158/http://www.worldenergy.org/documents/ser2004.pdf to http://www.worldenergy.org/documents/ser2004.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625044818/http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/206/206749.pdf to http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/206/206749.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325171121/http://referendum.interno.it/referendum/refe110612/RFT0003.htm to http://referendum.interno.it/referendum/refe110612/RFT0003.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
