Talk:Nui Dat

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nui Dat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Southeast Asia / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

What is this article proposed to be about?[edit]

This is a much needed article but I am not sure what it's primary focus is. Is it about a Vietnamese locality or an Australian Defence Force base? If it is the former, what exactly is Nui Dat? Is it a village, a region, a hill or some other feature? If it is the latter, then this is less a geographical article and more a military history article. Nothing wrong with that of course, but it will set the tone for the article. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 08:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]