This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
No mention is made of the so-called "Revisionist Historiography" in the Historiography section?
It is claimed in the intro in that section there are 3 main kinds of historiographical styles related to study of the USSR: "Western", "Soviet", and "Revisionist". And then only the first two styles get any actual mention. That is strange.
I do not think enough emphasis is put on the role of the kronstadt sailors before the attack with the cutting off of petrograd by destruction of bridges and telephone lines Sorry, do not have the time to sort this out myself but can someone please address this issue
The Historiography section of this article states that "The historiography of the Revolution generally divides into three camps: the Soviet-Marxist view, the Western-Totalitarian view, and the Revisionist view." The first two views are described in subsections but the third view is omitted as far as I can tell. Shouldn't there be a subsection for the revisionist view? 22.214.171.124 (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)