Talk:Odin-class coastal defense ship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Odin-class coastal defense ship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Odin-class coastal defense ship is part of the Coastal defense ships of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 15, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
September 13, 2013 Good topic candidate Promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 20, 2009.
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Ships (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. WikiProject icon
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Germany (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Odin class coastal defense ship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose: (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

1. The ships did lose significant speed in heavy seas. Suggest - The ships lost significant speed in heavy seas

2. 2 shaft 3 cyl vertical triple expansion; 4,800 ihp. Suggest - 2 shaft 3 cylinder vertical triple expansion; 4,800 shp

3. propulsion system as in Siegfried. Suggest - propulsion system that was in the Siegfried class.

4. After the refit. Which refit was this?

5. SK L/35 guns. Could do with a link

6. In an arrangement very unusual for such large guns. Suggest - In an arrangement that was very unusual for such large guns

7. two of which were. Suggest - two of the guns were

8. 200 mm of teak. Needs a conversion to inch's

9. ornament. Suggest a link for this


I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I think I've got everything actionable. There's no article about bow ornaments, so there's nothing I can really do there. Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Nice work. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)