Talk:Ohio State Route 701

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Ohio State Route 701 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
August 8, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject United States / Ohio (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
USRD MTF.svg
This article has a map. If the map has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
USRD KML.svg
This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 701/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 02:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The sentence "For its entire distance, SR 701 passes amidst open farmland, with a few patches of trees abutting the side of the highway, and the occasional home appearing along the way." needs to be reworded.
    This statement has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Do not use "then" in describing progression of route.
    The sentence that included "then" has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Yahoo Maps does not show the township boundaries. Can another map be used to verify this?
    The 2004 DeLorme Ohio Atlas provides details on township boundaries. This has been added as a source. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
    There are no available images for the article at this time. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few minor fixes. Dough4872 02:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)