Talk:Olivary body

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Anatomy (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.
 

Material from "Nucleus olivaris" article[edit]

This Nucleus olivaris article was redirected to the current article. Its contents(below) should merged with the current one.

A large aggregate of small densely packed nerve cells arranged in folded laminae shaped like a purse with the opening (hilum) directed medially. It corresponds in position to the oliva, projects to all parts of the contralateral half of the cerebellar cortex by way of the olivocerebellar tract, and is the only source of cerebellar climbing fibres. Its afferent connections include fibres from the spinal cord, the dentate nucleus and motor cortex, but its major input appears to be the central tegmental tract originating from multiple nuclei at midbrain levels.

CSTAR 00:22, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

not just medulla[edit]

This article says: "are a pair of prominent oval structures in the medulla oblongata". But afterswards it states that the superior olive is a part of the pons (and not medulla). A mistake? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.64.204.81 (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC).

function[edit]

What do the olivary nuclei actually do? 69.140.152.251 05:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

graphics[edit]

The graphics, and notations, many taken from Greys Anatomy, while forming a good basis for what was, no longer give a state of the art representation of the brain. This is not a complaint, Greys work has been and will forever be a fine addition to the body of knowledge, but this is the age of computers, We should be able to insert ourselves (Immersive virtual reality) at the size of an atom, and literally wander around the brain asking questions, and learn interactions, both in the brain and the body. This is a most important task, the very basis of what a human is.

I can see how useful wikipedias hyperlinked topics are, but the brain does not have the same filing system. The brains subtle relationships, conscious thoughts, abstract reasoning, and connection's to the automatic systems which control the physical and emotional status, while referenced, do not have the learning impact a didactic multimedia walk would have.

This is a giant topic, of great importance, that must be made accessible to everyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.246.208 (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)