Talk:One World Trade Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleOne World Trade Center has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2014Good article nomineeListed
November 13, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 4, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 4, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that One World Trade Center (pictured), at 1,776 feet (541 m) tall, is the tallest skyscraper in the Western Hemisphere?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 3, 2014.
Current status: Good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on One World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on One World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2017[edit]

I am a student at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and I am currently enrolled in a writing class. As a final project, I was to revise 3 pages of a Wiki article to improve clarity and readability. I chose the article on One World Trade Center, and would like to publish my revisions.

Thanks,

James Werosta Jrwerosta (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

As the template above notes, you should make a specific request. Since this article is semi-protected, if you're doing general copyediting, it might be better to choose a topic that isn't under some form of protection. There are several million other articles that are free to be edited by anyone, many of them needing copyediting. Acroterion (talk) 18:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Confused about current name[edit]

Would someone more knowledgeable be able to denote more clearly that the current One World Trade Center succeeds the name of its predecessor, the One World Trade Center. As a foreigner, I did not even realise that the original North Tower had another name. I believe this minor edit would help clarify things a little more.

Cheers, Heliatrope Fish (talk) 14:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC) p.s. first time requesting protected edit, I feel like I'm using the template wrong somehow? :S

 Already done You needn't worry, you're using it perfectly the right way. As to your request, the name similarity is addressed in the lead section, which states in the third sentence "The supertall structure has the same name as the North Tower of the original World Trade Center, which was destroyed in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001." .spintendo  19:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)