|Sources for development of this article may be located at|
I would like to see this article expanded upon. Online judge systems are great
The External Links section of this article doesn't meet the WP:EL guideline. There are around 44 links here when the guideline states: "Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum" and "...it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justifiable according to this guideline and common sense. The burden of providing this justification is on the person who wants to include an external link."
I've started fixing the EL section by removing all of the ~44 links as I couldn't see any that would fit an "official link" or to an association of online judges. Perhaps the information can be converted to a list inside this article or a separate list page showing notable entries.
If a list isn't tenable, let's get consensus on what should be added back... If you had to pick a couple External links that fit the WP:EL that we could get consensus on, which would the be? What justification do you offer for those couple ELs? Stesmo (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)