Talk:Ontario Highway 40

Ontario Highway 40 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 19, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article has a KML file.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 40/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"depression-relief project" is there a link, if not for this explicitly, the depression?
""section would be decommissioned" why "would be" when "was" works wonderfully?
Something something Einstein frame of reference.
Could link Interchange (road) (we don't really have those here).
Now I'm really curious as to "here". I assumed you were from the U.K. until now, to be honest.
Ok, we have "junctions" but we don't refer to them as "interchanges", if that makes sense, so linking it first time would be best. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"within the Municipality of" capital M?
"a 30 hectares (74 acres) "" -> adj=on
Is it Chatham-Kent or Chatham–Kent?
It's whatever "-" is hehe. I've made it consistent to that.
"north parallel to and several kilometres east" comma after north.
"divided four lane expressway" link?
And shouldn't four-lane be hyphenated in this usage as it's modifying "expressway"?
I've never been sure if a hyphen gets used for "four lane" vs. "four-laned"
"the spring of 1934" avoid seasons, they differ depending on where you are on the planet.
Been waiting to die on this hill :D The topic is noted as being in the northern hemisphere, isn't that enough to determine the seasons? I feel like it would be too wordy to say "between March and June" or similar for every case where I can't narrow something down to a specific month. If language can be regional, surely seasons can be just the same.
It's not a big issue. MOS:SEASON recommends we avoid it, but if a reader can link Canada to the northern hemisphere and then associate spring with that region, I guess we're all ok. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MLA, I don't know what that is, expand it before using the initialism.
"following World War II, automobile" no need to link the war.
But then how could one end up looking up something that has nothing to do with what they initially searched? I link it in most other articles, so this one I'm going to respectfully decline.
It's probably the most unnecessarily overlinked article in Wikipedia, and is of practically no relevance, but meh, one useless link's not going to kill anyone... The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"result, freeways and" you link freeway here, I'd do it earlier.
No opportunity for it. I think it works better setting it up with those two links grouped together, rather than only linking "bypass".
"an interchange at" likewise.
Turns out it is, and this instance is overlink.
Saint Lawrence -> St. Lawrence (consistency, and that's what our article is called).
Surprisingly it wasn't until I boldly moved them a few days ago! Not one source uses "Saint"
"navigable lock system" link lock?
"" the Aamjiwnaang First Nation (then" overlilnked.
"entire $12.6 million" I would advise add C to this $ just in case (assuming it is Canadian dollars??)
"Minister Snow was late to the ceremony due to a snowstorm" He was late... (sorry!)
But... but... but... :) That was for a DYK.
"Third Street bridge" not Bridge?
Just a bridge on Third Street, no official name.
""on May 1, 1963[20] and"" comma after year.
"as Highway 40.[25][24]" order.
"into a one-way pair with" overlinked.

That's all for now, so it's on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Responses indented within your comments. Everything I didn't specifically respond to has been fixed. Just down to the issues w.r.t. seasons, linking WW2 and freeway. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 03:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All good, I've responsed a bit above, but no further action required. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions