Talk:Operation Crossroads
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Crossroads article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Archives: 1 | |||
| Operation Crossroads is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operation Crossroads is part of the History of the Manhattan Project series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 4, 2013. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives |
|---|
Contents
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Operation Crossroads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024121304/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq76-1.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq76-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Proposal for change for all infoboxes[edit]
The previous test 'Trinity' uses an explicit image size 300px. All following ones don't specify it leaving default(pretty tiny) image. I'm not sure if most users are aware of or bother to change the default thumbnail size of 180 px in preferences. In addition the locations are listed separated by ; instead of using a plainlist (to ensure separate entries go on different lines)
The result is that in some tests the locations are exceeding hard to read and are jumbled together. Also there are too many line breaks because the infobox width is mainly taken from the image.
I propose to change all images to larger size (like Trinity) by changing the template upright=1.14 to upright 1.5 and change locations to plainlist. I did some tests on 'Redwing' and others and it looks better. Also the Infobox headers are not broken.
Here is the edited page (we can revert if needed) Operation Redwing
I just wanted to OK this with someone because its a big change affecting many pages. I suspect this page was the one that started the trend and others copied it. Crazytrain411 (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Update: After a lot of investigation, found that infobox width can be adjusted. Changing location lists to plainlists and increasing the width slightly(along with slight image size increase) on the template itself solves the jumbled location problem and looks much nicer.Crazytrain411 (talk) 16:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Operation Crossroads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201120238/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/DNA6032F.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/DNA6032F.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini4.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130614031250/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-s/ss184.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-s/ss184.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-i/cvl22.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218012550/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/factsheets/Wigwam.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/factsheets/Wigwam.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090618162850/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq87-6b.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq87-6b.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000521071018/http://history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini1.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini1.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq4-1.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218065013/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V1.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V1.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218065343/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V2.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V2.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218065519/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V3.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR8205V3.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218141446/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR84119.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/relatedpub/DNATR84119.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The three dead links had to be corrected by the GreenC Bot on 16 October 2017. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Operation Crossroads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029194805/http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_02019401a_121.pdf to http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_02019401a_121.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Plutonium not detectable by Geiger counters?[edit]
In the section “Warren persuades Blandy”, it is stated that plutonium isn’t / wasn’t detectable by Geiger counters. If that is / was true, then the reason why should be given, and included in the article about plutonium. ZFT (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, alpha particles have too much charge and weight to be very penetrating, failing to penetrate the glass tubes on the counters and the plastic on the dosimeters. Alphas are how plutonium radiates, so no plutonium detection. Fixed an explanation, removed a dubious tag. Better detectors in use today allow for alpha detection, if you get really close (alpha penetration through air is about 50% per centimeter.) SkoreKeep (talk) 23:05, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- FA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics History of the Manhattan Project featured content
- High-importance Featured topics articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- FA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- FA-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- FA-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- FA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- FA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- FA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class Micronesia articles
- Unknown-importance Micronesia articles
- FA-Class Marshall Islands articles
- Unknown-importance Marshall Islands articles
- Marshall Islands work group articles
- WikiProject Micronesia articles
- FA-Class United States articles
- FA-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- FA-Class United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles