Talk:Orton Ceramic Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / Ohio (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (marked as Low-importance).
 

Untitled[edit]

i represent the copyright holder for this information, please restore the page as it was, I will continue to add information. —This unsigned comment was added by Stuph (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}.

I've restored the article and listed it as a possible copyright problem. Please have someone with an email address @ortonceramic.com contact permissions@wikimedia.org (permissions at wikimedia dot org) to confirm that we have permission to release this under the GFDL. Thanks. Stifle 17:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

done. thank you. Stuph

?[edit]

how long does it take for an article to be restored? Stuph 14:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyright status[edit]

(moved from User talk:Samw: Hi. Was permission for this resolved? I can't find any evidence of it, just that the original contributor (User:Stuph) removed the copyvio notice and replaced the text in question. I'm relisting it as a copyvio in the meantime. Mark83 14:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Not that I'm aware of. Thanks for relisting. Samw 00:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I have emailed twice and posted that I represent the copyright holder. it is not copyvio. Stuph 00:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Appreciate your patience but copyright processing is apparently a backlogged item at Wikipedia. You can always offer an original rewrite at the subpage and that should be processed much more quickly. I believe I also offered to receive the copyright release in the absence of the one of the admins receiving and processing it. Samw 03:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
why rewrite when I wrote the original content? I represent the copyright holder. please clarify what must be done to avoid the reposting of the copyvio message. Stuph 18:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I only suggested a rewrite to avoid waiting for an admin to validate that you're the copyright holder. Samw 00:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
well, i won't be rewriting it. what else do i need to do? I've sent two emails. its silly to block this article. Stuph 12:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)