Talk:Ossulstone

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South-East Middlesex[edit]

The article states that Ossulstone covered the south-east of the county (meaning Middlesex). It goes on to state that it included Finchley, Friern Barnet and Hornsey. Surely this is a contradiction. Coyets (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its pretty much south east, given the odd shape of the units involved. [1] MRSC • Talk 09:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ossulstone was the south-eastern part of the traditional county of Middlesex. Most of Ossulstone was absorbed by London. Finchley, Frien Barnet and Hornsey are the northern remnants of Ossulstone that remained in Middlesex after the County of London was created. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.232.171 (talk) 15:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Divisions[edit]

The article states 'In the 17th century the hundred was split into four divisions...' but five are listed in the table: an error, or was one created later? Jackiespeel (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]