Talk:Ostwind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Germany (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Why call it "Ostwind (tank)" instead of just "Ostwind"? I think this is the primary Ostwind english readers would look up.

I also removed the note of discrepency. Considering that it's only off by one, and therefore more accurate then pretty much every other figure we have, I don't think it's really all that relevant. Oberiko 22:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)

I have no objections to just calling it "Ostwind"...and the difference of one tank is indeed small enogh to let it slip by :p Ferkelparade 13:34, 13 May 2004 (UTC)

I am under the impression that this imagecould be considered fair use; but I'm a n00b to edits and not really sure how to go about it all, especially with regards to images. It comes from this site which also has other old pictures of several WWII armor which may be of use. ~Springfinger 21:00 19 Sept 2006