I think I got these, but I'm not too familiar with dablinks. They're still showing up when I click the link above, even after I made changes. Let me know if I'm not doing something right.--Batard0 (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Ref 19, 39, 57, 58 should be pp.
I think I got all of 'em.--Batard0 (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
As a generalised point, the lead should act as summary for the entire article. Refs in the lead (in particular Ref 1, 2 and 3) are unnecessary because if something is mentioned there, it should be expanded upon the body. The quote one is fine.