Talk:PHPDoc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Free Software / Software / Computing  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Free Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of free software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 

I could be wrong, but the external link seems to be pointing to the wrong phpdoc site? I believe the official site is http://www.phpdoc.org/. Right now it points to www.phpdoc.de which seems to be something similar based upon the "official" version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.241.248.188 (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, fixed. II | (t - c) 08:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
http://phpdoc.de isn't "something similar based upon" phpdoc.org. that is a beta version from 2001 and was possibly also using the format. http://phpdoc.org is actually phpDocumentor and not a page about the format. The phpDocumentor binary is also called phpdoc. The phpdoc beta from 2001 is probably not relevant anymore. --JonnyJD (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)