From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Business (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Note: This appears to be advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

One man show?[edit]

Are there any good references to suggest that this publisher is anything other than a one-man show? From the packt site, the only name mentioned is David Barnes, and he identifies himself variously as aquisition editor, series editor, author relationship manager and so on. His blog is also prominently featured on each of packt's pages. True there are several book reviews on slashdot, but it seems they're all from "Michael J. Ross" and submitted to slashdot after he had received a promo copy of the book from packt. Not really an independent source. Thrapper (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

It's not. The guy who founded it, his son goes to my school, and he came and did a talk about it last year. There's at least 5 employees. Joemalt1832 (talk) 18:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

I am David Barnes of Packt Publishing and believe me if I was running the whole show I'd never stop bragging about it. Packt now employs about 200 people spread between Birmingham, UK and Mumbai, India. -- David Barnes, 11/Sep/2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Packt Awards 2010?[edit]

The results of the Packt Awards 2010 are still missing in the article :(

-- (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Openvpn-book.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]


An image used in this article, File:Openvpn-book.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)