This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article had a clarification note attached to it because a portion was confusing. This part was in the article that I am not certain if it is part of Bengal as the appendix or is part of west Indian as the sixth book. Can someone with more in the know figure it out:
" The last part, called Uttara khanda, contains legends and mythology associated with Indian festivals, eighteen chapters called as Gita Mahatmya, followed by chapters of Bhagavata Mahatmya and Shiva Gita, discussion of soul and liberation, quotes from the Upanishads, Yoga and the Advaita Vedanta doctrines. The text, in some versions of the manuscripts, ends with Kriya-yogasara which is a discussion of ethics and hospitality to guests. "
The clarification note is for a paragraph in the main article, and your edits extended to numerous sections. We need to stick to what the source is stating, and not introduce WP:OR. Do you have a copy of the Ludo Rocher book, so we can discuss your proposed changes line by line? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Everything that I included was in the original article text so I am unable to understand how OR would work into this article that clearly had a note that it needed clarification. The notes for each section that were moved moved with the text. If you feel that how the article is now is how it should be verses what I wrote I cannot help you. I hope that you corrected the misspelling that was cause for me to come upon the article.Srednaus Lenoroc (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I have clarified the tagged part and moved it into a separate section. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)