|WikiProject Aviation / Airports||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject United States / Washington||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
Boeing plant in Everett
I've added references to both the original MRD's recommendation to discourage commercial air service, and to the joint county review of the MRD that recommended the MRD be retired and not used as a planning document for KPAE.Sbrynen (talk) 05:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Future Air Service
CorruptionFighter yea, there isn't anything scheduled, but it is in fact in the works. the FAA pressured Paine into looking into building a new terminal. how do you know there isn't? did you read the source? im not arguing with you beyond this. just telling you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Padsquad43 (talk • contribs)
The single most important current affair for KPAE is the application by two airlines to serve the airport with scheduled passenger service. Unfortunately someone keeps removing the reference, and adding words like "unwanted" to the description of this. Unless you can show why the removals are appropriate, I will request a 3rd party to adjudicate this dispute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbrynen (talk • contribs) 16:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
CorruptionFighter; if you think naming the airlines that serve, or potentially serve an airport, can I suggest you start removing the names of airlines at LHR & JFK and see what kind of reaction you receive. Also, it appears that you are targeting only commercial air carriers, considering them as advertising, but Boeing, Goodrich and the names of flight schools are openly mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbrynen (talk • contribs) 16:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Just a heads up, but the ATS building at the south end of the field has been purchased by Boeing and is known as the EMC or "Everett Modification Center". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 03:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
"small international airport"
This is used in the lede, first sentence. This may not reflect the character of the airport. It is not a small airport. It is "international" only in the sense of a customs presence. However, a customs presence is a poor defining criteria for this airport. Many airports with passenger service try to make their names sound more important, so they add "international" to the name, especially in the U.S. This is not necessary in this article. I propose that "small" and "international" be deleted from the first sentence. Vanguard10 (talk) 02:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)