Talk:Palace of Caserta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Comment[edit]

Someone with more confidence than grasp of nuance moved Palace of Caserta to Caserta Palace..." like other palaces around the world that use the english term "palace" in the title". Such as Versaillespalace and Louvrepalace, no doubt. --Wetman 16:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks are due to User:Gryffindor for making the change back that I'd not dared to.--Wetman (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Total surface[edit]

In the network there are in fact only information about the encumbrance of the structure itself, ie 47000 square meters (the royal palace has in fact a side of 247 meters in length and the other of 190 meters, for a result precisely of 46930 square meters) This result however it should be multiplied by the 5 floors of the palace, to arrive at a more probable result of 160 thousand square meters approximately. This figure was obtained by subtracting the 47.000 square meters overall size of the 15000 square meters of the four inner courts (each 3848 square meters wide, being side rectangles of 74x52 meters) obtaining the "net" surface of each plan, ie 31600 meters. 31600 square meters for 5 floors it gives a result of 160 thousand square meters approximately. To get a sense of the enormous size of the Palace unjustly considered to 47,000 square meters, the Palace of Versailles in France has "only" 67 thousand square meters, ie not even half of the surface summarily calculated by me of 160 thousand square meters, or with the Royal Palace in Madrid, also of five floors and with a nominal surface of 135 thousand square meters, but Caserta is visibly larger. 82.57.17.215 (talk) 00:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Palace of Caserta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)