From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history (Rated Stub-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale.

"Paranuclear" is an adjective. We don't normally use adjectives as the titles of articles. Deb 07:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

And it's not the most common term, either. Should this be at paranuclear country, nuclear-capable country, or just be merged to the main "list of" article? Alai 00:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Why does this article exist?[edit]

"Paranuclear" is not a commonly used term, and the article is essentially without content. NPguy (talk) 23:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

time to delete this article already[edit]

It's useless. NPguy (talk) 01:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

My opinion has not changed. This is not a term anyone uses. There's one potentially useful link with the term "latent nuclear weapons capability." It might be worth having an article with a more self-explanatory title like that, but even so it is not possible to define cleanly. NPguy (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


The reference is a bit dodgy as it only states that it has a uranium mining capability that could be put towards nuclear weapons and then states it only has one tiny reactor. Basically, wouldn't this make the congo a "paranuclear" power? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)