"Paranuclear" is an adjective. We don't normally use adjectives as the titles of articles. Deb 07:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
Why does this article exist?
time to delete this article already
My opinion has not changed. This is not a term anyone uses. There's one potentially useful link with the term "latent nuclear weapons capability." It might be worth having an article with a more self-explanatory title like that, but even so it is not possible to define cleanly. NPguy (talk) 02:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
The reference is a bit dodgy as it only states that it has a uranium mining capability that could be put towards nuclear weapons and then states it only has one tiny reactor. Basically, wouldn't this make the congo a "paranuclear" power? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)