Talk:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
July 26, 2006 Peer review Reviewed


"used of nudity" should be "use of nudity" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Can someone fix the spelling of Bill Maher's name?[edit]

It is in the list of members under Bill Mahar. I was going to change it but cannot due to the protected status of the article.

This article needs more criticism before it can become a good article or a featured article. Perhaps a criticism section or a separate article for criticism?[edit]

As the title to this section states, this article is in need of well-written, legitimate criticism of the group and of certain of its unethical aspects, which is largely absent or hard to find. Could you fellow editors reach a new consensus on including criticism in a separate section? We do not want PETA sockpuppets to whitewash the article of criticism. Also, if a criticism section cannot be made, how about a separate article about criticism in the "See also" section? What do you think, ladies and gentlemen? Zakawer (talk) 20:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. At the moment all criticism is squashed into the intro. -- (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I completely agree. I actually came to this page because I wanted to know more about the controversy of PETA and wikipedia often has a section about that. Deep.fried.bacon (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC) (Also I couldn't figure out how to add a separate post nested under this original one so I just added this here. I wasn't sure if that was the proper way to do it, so if not if someone could let me know what is the proper way, I'd be grateful.)

If a criticism and controversy section and/or a separate article for criticism doesn't work, we're gonna have to incorporate a buttload of criticism into the article's lead and especially into the body of the article. Still, the article needs a lot of work before reaching GA or FA status. Zakawer (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

dog stolen off porch[edit]

Is the old news story where a pup was stolen off a porch in the criticisms of PETA section? I don't see it. It made the rounds and was big news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolven1 (talkcontribs) 19:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources