Talk:Peter Tinley

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Tinley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Australia: Military history / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Peter Tinley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Biography / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Current article veto[edit]

Article nominated for cleanup as lacks neutrality, modified by Ptinley which concerns 'conflict of interest', and requires heavy citation of factual events and general Wiki cleanup. Feel free to discuss. Kind Regards, William --sacalaz —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Labor Party[edit]

The article states "Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, approached Tinley to represent the Federal Division of Stirling for the Australian Labor Party in the next Federal election[2]." Kim beazley is no longer the labour party leader having been replaced by Kevin Rudd. I changed the sentence to "Ex Federal Opposition Leader, Kim Beazley, approached Tinley in 2006 to represent the Federal Division of Stirling for the Australian Labor Party in the upcoming Federal election[2], 2007." Not the best sentence in the world but its more accurate. Feel free to modify --Spuzzdawg 02:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptinley (talk • contribs) 07:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rank?[edit]

Usual to give the rank at retirement of military personel. Anyone know his?--Mongreilf (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]