Talk:Philip Morrison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

Anyone have any objections to the insertion of the following sourced material:

Morrison joined the Young Communist League in 1938 and the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) in 1939 while studying physics at the University of California Berkely.
Source: * Philip Morrison testimony, 7 and 8 May 1953, "Subversive Influence in the Educational Process," U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, 83rd Congress, 1st Session, part 9, pgs. 899-919.

Thank you. Nobs01 8 July 2005 16:40 (UTC)

Tell us more. How long did he remain a member? A week? Forty years? A card-carrying Communist at Los Alamos in the inner circle of the Manhattan Project? Or had he left the CP before than , just as Oppenheimer had (long) left it? Groves kept Bohm from a clearance, why not Morrison? (For example of an interesting question.) Tell us more of this most interesting phase of his life. Is that ref the Congressional Record, or what is it? GangofOne 21:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Removed, now broken, link to SETI.org. I have always admired Professor Morrison. It is a shame that SETI.org has dropped this link being the influence he had for their use of microwaves. He seem to be born of the same enthusiasm as Richard P. Feynman. (IchBin 19:42, 1 January 2006 (UTC))

Speaking of Feynman, I've heard that he and Morrison shared an office while they were both at Cornell. Does anyone know if this is true? Rglovejoy 02:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes.

Back in the '30s everyone and his brother joined the U.S. Communist Party. There's nothing remarkable about Morrison joining around that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.32 (talk) 23:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Philip Morrison/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Hawkeye7 (talk)

Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. SFriendly.svg --Seabuckthorn  19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


1: Well-written

WP:LEAD:

Check for WP:LEAD:

  1. Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section: Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE): Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for Introductory text: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO): Yes check.svg Done SFriendly.svg
    • Check for Relative emphasis: Yes check.svg Done SFriendly.svg
    • Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN): Yes check.svg Done
      • Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE): Yes check.svg Done
      • Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE): Yes check.svg Done
      • Check for Proper names and titles: Yes check.svg Done
      • Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None
      • Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None
      • Check for Pronunciation: None
      • Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK): Yes check.svg Done
      • Check for Biographies: NA
      • Check for Organisms: NA
  4. Check for Biographies of living persons: NA
  5. Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Non-English titles:
    • Check for Usage in first sentence:
    • Check for Separate section usage:
  6. Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH): Yes check.svg Done
    • The lead should be expanded.
  7. Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None
WP:LAYOUT:
Yes check.svg Done

Check for WP:LAYOUT: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY. Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Headings and sections: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Section templates and summary style: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Works or publications: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Links to sister projects: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Navigation templates: Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for Formatting: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Images (WP:LAYIM): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Links: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE): Yes check.svg Done
WP:WTW:
Yes check.svg Done

Check for WP:WTW: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for Words that may introduce bias: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Puffery (WP:PEA): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Editorializing (WP:OPED): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for Expressions that lack precision: Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None
  3. Check for Offensive material (WP:F***): Yes check.svg Done

Check for WP:MOSFICT: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI): Yes check.svg Done
    • Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT): Yes check.svg Done
WP:EMBED:
Yes check.svg Done


2: Verifiable with no original research

WP:RS:
Yes check.svg Done

Check for WP:RS: Yes check.svg Done

Cross-checked with the other FAs: Edmund Herring, Neil Hamilton Fairley, Landing at Nadzab, Albert Kesselring, James Whiteside McCay, Harry Chauvel, Thomas C. Kinkaid, Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Kenneth Walker, Thomas Blamey, Douglas MacArthur, Frank Berryman, James B. Conant, Iven Mackay, Walter Krueger, Vernon Sturdee, Enrico Fermi, Niels Bohr

  1. Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (contentious) Yes check.svg Done
    • Is it contentious?: Yes
    • Does the ref indeed support the material?:
  2. Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING): Yes check.svg Done
    • Who is the author?:
    • Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
    • What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
    • What else has the author published?:
    • Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
  3. Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING): Yes check.svg Done
  4. Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):
WP:MINREF:
Yes check.svg Done

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for Direct quotations: Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for Likely to be challenged: Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA
WP:NOR:
Yes check.svg Done
  1. Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for synthesis (WP:SYN): Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for original images (WP:OI): Yes check.svg Done


3: Broad in its coverage

a. Major aspects:
Yes check.svg Done

Cross-checked with the other FAs: Edmund Herring, Neil Hamilton Fairley, Landing at Nadzab, Albert Kesselring, James Whiteside McCay, Harry Chauvel, Thomas C. Kinkaid, Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Kenneth Walker, Thomas Blamey, Douglas MacArthur, Frank Berryman, James B. Conant, Iven Mackay, Walter Krueger, Vernon Sturdee, Enrico Fermi, Niels Bohr

  1. Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:
    1. Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:
    2. Check for Out of scope:
  2. Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:
    1. Check for All material that is notable is covered:
    2. Check for All material that is referenced is covered:
    3. Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:
    4. Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:
    5. Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):
b. Focused:
Yes check.svg Done
  1. Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):
  2. Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):


4: Neutral

WP:NPOV:
Yes check.svg Done

4. Fair representation without bias: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for POV (WP:YESPOV): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING): Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE): Yes check.svg Done
  4. Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE): Yes check.svg Done
  5. Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS): Yes check.svg Done
  6. Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID): Yes check.svg Done
  7. Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV): Yes check.svg Done
  8. Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL): Yes check.svg Done
  9. Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE): Yes check.svg Done
  10. Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV): Yes check.svg Done
  11. Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV): Yes check.svg Done
  12. Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None
  13. Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None


5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images Yes check.svg Done (PD)

Images:
Yes check.svg Done

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for copyright status: Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for non-free content (WP:NFC): Yes check.svg Done
  4. Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR): Yes check.svg Done

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Yes check.svg Done

  1. Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE): Yes check.svg Done
  2. Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE): Yes check.svg Done
  3. Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION): Yes check.svg Done


I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist, I do have some insights that I think will be useful in improving the article:

  • I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview and to give relative emphasis.
  • I think the lead should be expanded.
  • "On graduation from high school he entered Carnegie Tech planning to major in electrical engineering." (1a issue: is it correct?)
    • Yes, this is correct. Changed to "graduating" Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • "Morrison transport the core of the Trinity test gadget to the test site in the back seat of a Dodge sedan.[9]" (1a issue: transported.)
  • "After the war ended, Morrison and Robert Serber traveled to Hiroshima as part of the Manhattan Project's mission to asses the damage.[9]" (1a issue: spelling)
  • "Morrison died in his sleep of a respiratory failure at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on April 22, 2005." (Can you rephrase it? Something similar to "On April 22, 2005, Morrison died of a respiratory failure while asleep at his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts.")
    • I'd really prefer the first form, as "died in his sleep" is the preferred idiom. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Hawkeye7, please feel free to strike out any recommendation you think will not help in improving the article. All the best, SFriendly.svg --Seabuckthorn  23:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

  • All points addressed. Thanks for your review. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Hawkeye7, very much for your diligence. SFriendly.svg --Seabuckthorn  22:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Promoting the article to GA status. SCongratulate.svg --Seabuckthorn  22:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

External link to interview on nuclear policy?[edit]

Would an interview with Philip Morrison from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_D4A1F75C37684257996166085F52961B (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

YesY Added. I like the readers to be able to see and hear the subject where possible. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)