|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
The following may be of interest in ref'ing or editing this article:
- Gerratt & Kreiman, 2001. "Toward a taxonomy of nonmodal phonation", Journal of Phonetics 29:365–382
Built In Play Buttons for Variations in Laryngeal Setting?
It would be very nice to have sound samples for not just separate phonemes, but also for variations in laryngeal setting. It's kind of hard to judge from text alone what's the acoustic difference between breathy and slack phonation, for example, or what does stiff voice actually sound like. These could feature the same segment spoken in each laryngeal setting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Write an article that readers can understand?
I too found this article extremely difficult to follow. I feel like almost every word needs to be read. As the overview of the field I feel it should be more digestible. Jnfrank (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Does this article really need to have a section on neurochronaxic theory? It was discredited at least 50 years ago. It's a bit like having a section on flat-earth theory in a geography article. RoachPeter (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Banner photos of vocal fokds
Reading this (on the mobile app) quite prominently features the top picture of vocal folds, which I find to be a bit offputting. Perhaps they don't need to be featured quite as prominently (I.e., they perhaps don't need to be a banner above the article.) Jnfrank (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)