From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Novels (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Comics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marginalized peoples' lives?[edit]

I just cut a section from this article, but I'm including a copy of it below in case anyone wants to clean it up and restore it.

The article is about adaptations of movies and TV shows. The paragraph that I cut comes out of left field--it has no connection to the rest of the article. It has no sources. It isn't at all clear to me what it means to say that a photonovel is used to "create meaning and voice about an issue important to marginalized peoples' lives." The phrasing, the lack of context, and the apparent irrelevancy combine to make me think this was probably meant as a joke.

If it wasn't, then please do the following:

1. Restore the section, but put it at the end of the article instead of the beginning. Even if this material is true, it's definitely not what most people are talking about when they refer to photonovels.

2. Add sources.

3. Add a sentence or two of introductory context, explaining why and how photonovels are used to achieve these goals.

4. Explain what the phrase "international research" has to do with anything.

The paragraph I removed is included here:

In the international research arena, photonovels have served as an empowering tool for marginalized groups to think critically about their realties and then engage in cumulative action to express their political and social realities to wide ranging audiences. Directed, written, acted, and photographed by participants themselves, photonovels have been used in America (Rudd & Comings, 1996, and Susan Auger), China (Wang & Burris, 1994), Canada (Laura Nimmon, 2007) and South Africa (James and Colleagues, 2005) to create meaning and voice about an issue important to marginalized peoples’ lives. For example, photonovels have been used by Chinese rural workers to create social meaning in order to inform policy, by ESL speaking immigrant women in Canada order to express their health concerns, and in AIDS education interventions; uniquely developed within South Africa by South African people. Photonovels are a different genre than photovoice as they are formed using a comic book style.

--Elysdir (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

This article shouldn't be about only TV/movie adaptations, since that's not what "photonovel" means; such adaptations are a narrow subset of the topic. Note: Sources were obviously added; it's not that they were missing, but rather that the citations were incomplete, and need to be expanded with {{cite book}}, {{cite journal}}, etc., as appropriate. I.e, I agree with you that there's a sourcing problem here, but it's just a different one than no sources. Namely, our readers don't know which "Wang" or "Burris" or whoever is being cited, and mostly only academics and students would be able to easily find these sources, through journal archive search services that their institutions have access to. And I also agree with you that the entire passage needs cleanup if it's to be restored. It's rather difficult to figure out what that prose is going on about. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 08:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Merge proposed[edit]

The Fumetti article is simply a content fork of the Photonovel article, and is a violation of WP:NOT#DICT, by creating a redundant article simply to cater to the specific term, instead of redirecting that term to the extant article and listing that term there as an alternative name for the topic. That said, the content at Fumetti is more developed in some ways than here at Photonovel, though in other ways it is full of cruft and trivia that needs to be deleted or at least cleaned up. It is tagged with {{examplefarm}}. The history material, however, is probably keepable, though it needs better sourcing. The lead is also far superior to the one here. Fumetti should redirect to Photonovel (or both to Photographic comic, or whatever - the point being, there should be one article about this). A {{redirect|Fumetti|the Italian meaning|Italian comics}} hatnote should be retained. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 08:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Agree with the merge. Use the best of both articles. Sir Rhosis (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decide on the best term, then go ahead with the merge, including correct Interwiki links. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Another merge: Fotonovela[edit]

Basically the same as fumetti, save the nationality... -- megA (talk) 22:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)