The article Letters to Jenny was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 March 2023 with a consensus to merge the content into Piers Anthony. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Constitution, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Constitution of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States ConstitutionWikipedia:WikiProject United States ConstitutionTemplate:WikiProject United States ConstitutionUnited States Constitution articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Let me start by stating I'm not attempting to discredit the claims... I've read these books... but if the Wiki page is going to say Throughout the 2010s, numerous science fiction community sources..., shouldn't there be more than one source to back it up? John Bullock (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. It's just one source, which to me seems like WP:UNDUE for such extreme, WP:BLP skirting claims. I'm removing it. —Torchiesttalkedits 06:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a new version of the controversy section; I think the criticisms of Anthony are fairly wide-spread, a significant part of his reputation as a writer in science-fiction and fantasy circles, and should be reflected here. In an attempt to redress the previous issues with the section, I've added more sources, I've tried to use less charged language in summarizing the criticisms, and I've added some comments made by Anthony in various interviews. 198.27.248.4 (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Purely in the interests of readability, I'd be tempted to reword have taken issue with themes of underage sexuality and eroticism throughout Anthony's work. It could easily be read like people have taken issue with themes of underage sexuality (one item) and eroticism (another item). I presume it's intended to mean "sexuality and eroticism" as a single issue (I've not seen any criticism of Anthony's eroticism except where it concerns children). Perhaps just "themes of underage sexuality" would be sufficient? It's a nitpicky change though so I won't make that edit unless I get some agreement. John Bullock (talk) 10:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure something's happened to him, as it's been 3 months since any update on his website newsletter and he's gone silent on his email. 97.107.37.1 (talk) 07:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He's still alive, although you are correct that his newsletter hasn't been updated. This was the last post [1]Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
