Jump to content

Talk:Pocky & Rocky (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

"The original title "KiKi KaiKai: Nazo no Kuro Manto" translates to "Mysterious Ghost World: Riddle of the Black Mantle"."

This can't be right. My knowledge of Japanese is limited, but this seems to be a classic case of an English-speaker mistaking "no" to be the equivalent of "of". It isn't. This doesn't refer to the riddle of the Black Manta, it's the other way around; Black Manta of the riddle. This sounds kinda stupid in English though, and "mysterious" is already used for another translation in the title, so I urge someone to come up with something different. Hattes 22:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now checked this up and I am right. I edited the page to reflect this, but it was reverted due to being unsourced. I am now removing the information altogether, since I know that the source is wrong. Hattes (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This can't be the original boxart, is it?

[edit]

Tell me, is that the original boxart with the japanese removed and the english added in, or is the super nintendo boxart a whole new boxart entirely? I want to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.125.87 (talk) 07:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the original boxart, according to this page Hattes (talk) 22:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pocky & Rocky box.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pocky & Rocky box.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pocky & rocky.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pocky & rocky.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pocky & Rocky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]