|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pokémon Stadium article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Video games||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Pokémon||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
When I go to Pokemon Stadium Two(2)'s page, it redirects me to Pokemon Stadium's page because there were actually 3 Pokemon Stadiums' in Japan. That's unaccurate information, so someone needs to make a page for Pokemon Stadium Two(2). And the Pokemon Stadium and Pokemon Stadium Two(2)'s pages are really a copy of each other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 05:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Pokemon Stadium and Pocket Monster Stadium Being Merged
Me who is the creator of the Pocket Monster Stadium Page, I would agree that they should be merged. This was my first Wikipedia page that I submitted. Though what would happen to the Pocket Monster Page along with its Pictures? I know its not much info and I directly ripped the info from the Pokemon Stadium page, I think you should at least use the Release Date info.
P.S. This is my first time using the talk page
Applepieman 21:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Glitch with G/S/C
The glitches section states that Gold/Silver/Crystal can still be played on Pokémon Stadium through a glitch. However, I have tried this, and I didn't get it to work. Am I not doing something right, or is this a lie? TanookiMario257 06:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This article conflicts with itself, stating in the article it was released in 1998 while the release date on the side says 1999? SpigotMap 07:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
just wondering did Nintendo actually releasewith their system a prima guide in a buncle? or the Nintendo Official guide? it would make more sense for them to bundle their own guide, can anyone check this? JetackuJetacku (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Famitsu score error
I have a copy of Famitsu magazine that shows scores of 9, 8, 8, and 8. By my count, 9+8+8+8=33, not 31 as reported by IGN. In particular it looks like they have scores of 1 point lower for the first two scorers. The magazine I have is an anniversary collection of many reviews reprinted in 2006 and so I suppose there may have been an error on Famitsu's part in transferring the numbers from the 1999 review to their 2006 anniversary issue, but then again it could just as easily be IGN's error. I guess finding an actual 1999 copy of Famitsu would be the way to solve this question, but I thought I should bring it up here before making any changes. What do people here think should be done? -Thibbs (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Per this discussion, I've gone ahead and exchanged the IGN-reported score for the one from Famitsu. To what extent the IGN source can be used for other claims in the article is not something I'm prepared to address at the moment, but just so it's not lost, I'll shift it into talk below:
- -Thibbs (talk) 14:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)