Talk:Polarizing filter (photography)/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Fail --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 15:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 15:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • For topics notable for only one reason, this reason should usually be given in the first sentence.
    • "The" (in 1st sentence) → "a" and add "actually" (optional) before the "a" in the same sentence.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Many major aspects such as the ones related to "Physics" have been missed.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • Some captions missing.
    • Captions could have better wording.
    • An image caption should only end with a full-stop if it forms a complete sentence.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.