Talk:Polycotylus

A news item involving Polycotylus was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 August 2011.

Wikipedia

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Polycotylus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Species[edit]

Polycotylus ischiadicus was made the type species of the new genus Thalassiosaurus by Welles (1943), while the name Plesiosauus ichthyospondylus is a nomen nudum because Seeley (1869) provided a type specimen but did not accompany it with a description and indicated that his taxa were never intended to take taxonomic precedence.

H.G. Seeley, 1869, Index to the Fossil Remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia from the Secondary System of Strata, arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge. III, Cambridge University Press

S. P. Welles. 1943. Elasmosaurid plesiosaurs with description of new material from California and Colorado. Memoirs of the University of California 13:125-254. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

True or false[edit]

Is it true that it is also found in Russia and Australia or is this a mistake?

Did you bother to read the paper in the source?--Mr Fink (talk) 20:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]