Talk:Pope Benedict XVI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articlePope Benedict XVI was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 6, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 27, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 9, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 14, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 28, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
October 4, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pope Benedict XVI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Liberal?[edit]

It is being mentioned that Ratzinger was once considered liberal. This claim should be debated as the term “liberal” does not quite fit well to Ratzinger, even to the young Ratzinger. He was “modern”, ok, but liberal? No! OnSpeech (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

OnSpeech, Wikipedia's core concept is verifiability, not truth. As Der Spiegel characterized his views this way, we are not in a position to do otherwise. For more information, see Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Der Spiegel is a news magazine which is proud of its strong opinions. So what does it verify more than a journalist’s opinion. A solid religious book would be of another league. But Der Spiegel? Not really? Really? OnSpeech (talk) 16:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

"Pope Emeritus"[edit]

I believe this to be an entirely informal and unofficial title. If there's evidence of this title having some official usage, please speak up. My intention is to label "Emeritus" as an informal and unofficial title. patsw (talk) 23:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

It's the term used by the Vatican. I pretty much think they can decide what Benedict is called - certainly their use means it's not "unofficial", and you would need some actual secondary source to support your opinion that it's informal. [1] [2] [3] [4] - Nunh-huh 23:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement to research this. The Vatican assigned the title. It was not invented by the secular media. patsw (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)