Talk:Pope John Paul I conspiracy theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Before we consider "conspiracy theories" - which is already POV - shouldn't there be an issue of "un/natural death"? Could he not have been murdered by one person acting alone? --Hugh7 (talk) 04:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


I've moved the Neutrality tag from Pope John Paul I to here after discussion on the that talk page. The POV tag here seems closely linked with the {{cleanup}} and {{unreferenced}} tags on this article. Please see the information on Talk:Pope John Paul I for more information and previous discussions about the neutrality (or lack there of) of this section. —mako (talkcontribs) 14:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Godfather III[edit]

Didn't the film Godfather III suggest that the death of this Pope was a conspiracy that involved Michael Corleone? I'd think it would be included in the Popular Culture section. 18:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

It is there now but as parts of the Rational and Popular Culture sections. Surely this reference should only be in the Popular Culture section as the rationale influenced the film not the other way round? I might merge the Rationale bit into Popular Culture. Any objections? Jubilee♫clipman 01:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Not Biography[edit]

This article is not a biography and is not within the scope of the WikiProject Biography. Removed WikiBio tag. C. Williams (talk) 06:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Views on homosexuality and abortion[edit]

There are also conspiracy theories out there that claim that Pope John Paul I was ready to tolerate homosexuality and abortion, and that this was one for the reasons for his alleged poisoning. I find this to be quite far-fetched, but if anyone else can find evidence that Archbishop Luciani tolerated those things, it would not be a bad thing to write them down. [1] ADM (talk) 04:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

If you want to understand Luciani's attitudes toward things like divorce, birth control, test tube babies and living together without being married, go here -- although this is an "OMG heresy" site. Especially birth control. I think that he would have revoked Humanae Vitae if he had lived. He doesn't seem "liberal" to me, but rather had a very practical sense of what it means to be human. --Bluejay Young (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


I’ve moved the bit about Godfather III to the Popular Culture section; it doesn’t really fit in the Rationale section, does it? Moonraker12 (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

tags removed[edit]

I'm removing the tags which said there weren't enough references and so forth, since there are plenty of references now.

Gone. --Bluejay Young (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Lots of things that are forbidden get done anyway.[edit]

Say, killing people. Therefore, I ammended the sentence that previously said it's "impossible" to be a Roman Catholic and a Freemason (hell, I know two Freemasons that were baptised and nobody bothered to excommunicate so far, thus being Roman Catholics). — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

the link for the author is incorrect[edit]

the author doesn't have a wiki page and the recipient of the VC linked to as the author died over 100 years before the event of pope john paul I's death. can someone clean that up? (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)