This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The reason why Portunus was conflated is in his identification with Palaimon, the son of Leucothea. Since Matuta the goddess of dawn had been interpreted as Leucothea her myth implied the story of her and her son Palaimon or Melicerte. Portunus was originally connected with the storing of grains? However his figure was already originally connected with doors and passages as is shown by the key in his hand and the ritual of throwing the keys in fires, which must be very ancient. On the whole he is very similar to Janus.Aldrasto (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
My doubts remain. I think the authority on which the contributor draw the information for this article must have confused Portunus and Consus. Consus was the god concerned with the storing of grains and his fetival was held just a few days later on Aug. 21. This is probably the reason of the confusion. Portunus is the god of passages, doors and harbours. He is in a way similar to Janus, though his function is more limited and his rank of course much lower. Janus being considered the initiator of everything, our universe, gods and man. If nobody objects I shall edit the text of the article: of course I will be glad to discuss the topic in advance with previous editors.Aldrasto (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. -- Tavix(talk) 01:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Portunus (mythology) → Portunes – I would like to change name in the English section to Portunes from Portunus. Because in many of the English books and websites which are dealing with Roman mythology is correctly referenced name as the Portunes. The Portunus or Portumnus is name of the god in the latin language, but correct name of the god in the English is the Portunes, that's why I would like to change Article name in the English section to make it correct.
example of books references:
Witch Daze By Patricia Della-Piana
Mythic Rome By Pete Nash
Alien DNA identified in Man By Marcos Christodonte Sr. Brenc1K (talk) 12:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose. Scholarly sources in English spell the god's name "Portunus". If it's good enough for C.M. Bowra, it's good enough for wikipedia. Standard reference works – Encyclopedia Britannica, Lewis & Short, the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology – use "Portunus". I can't find a reliable source in English that spells the god's name "Portunes"—Alien DNA Identified in Man certainly doesn't count! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Oppose, for the reasons stated above. This seems like a particularly importune request, coming less than two months after the page was moved to its current title; current in both Wikipedia and in classical scholarship. It's possible that the alleged "English version" has been widely used at some point, but if so it should be relatively easy to find a number of reliable sources that use it; and the ones cited above do not appear to be particularly authoritative. P Aculeius (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.