From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Prayer was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
September 7, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed
November 7, 2007 Peer review Reviewed
January 18, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Prayer:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Article requests : *Lead Way to short. See WP:LEAD. Orisons should be bold synom here.
    • Forms of prayer Aviod phrases like "The great spiritual traditions", that is an inappropriate tone for an encyclopedia. Bullet points need to be converted to prose. Also avoid weseal words like "Some anthropologists believe . . ."
    • The act of prayer No references. Lots of weseal words. (partly dealt with)
    • Include metaphysical examinations of whether prayer can work, in general, or when considered within specific religious traditions.
    • Prayer in Abrahamic religions The various subsections here should be summaries of the main article. For example look at Prayer in Christianity: main topics are The Early Church; Liturgical; Vocal; Meditative; Prayer of recollection; Contemplative prayer; Physical posture; Charismatic prayer: Speaking in tongues; A Christian philosophy of prayer; Christian Science Prayer; and Epistemological issues. Less than half of these topics are summarized. Your summary of Christian prayer in this article should only need small additions and tweaking to be the lead over at Prayer in Christianity. The same issue needs looking into throughout this section. No references for this section.
      • How is neopaganism an Abrahamic religion
    • Prayer in Eastern religions Same issues as last section. Also I am noticing the lack of animist traditions. Having only an Eastern section and a Abrahmic section means other traditions are left out.
    • Approaches to prayer Needs more references.
    • Experimental evaluation of efficacy of prayer This is slighty out of context without an introduction to the whole idea of Prayer healing. BTW Prayer healing is a redirect to this article and probably should be addressed directly and bolded.
    • Historical polytheistic prayer This is the first the first mention of scrafice related to prayer. Despite the earlier section of "Prayer in the Bible" The whole section seem out of place. Why leave out the Aztecs or the Vikings? And what about non-historical polytheistic prayer? No references
    • Etymology I would think this section would be first rather than last. No references. (partly dealt with)
    • Misc For some reason Prayer Warrior and Prayer group redirect here they should probably go to Prayer in Christianity but they are not really dealt with there either.--BirgitteSB 15:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
      • The section has been started, not yet satisfactory. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 21:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
    • The article has little on Japan. I've listed some topics related to Japan on the article's talk page. Fg2 11:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Add a paragraph on New Age prayer.
    • Add sourced paragraphs on African traditional religions and Aboriginal Dreamings. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 23:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

New quote[edit]

Perhaps {{cquote|If you talk to God, you are praying. If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia. - Thomas S. Szasz<ref>[ Thomas Szasz quotes]</ref> }} can be included


Same artist, google file
Mary Magdalene by Ary Scheffer (1795–1858). IMAGE BLACK AND WHITE, ONLY 320 × 504 pixels, file size: 24 KB, scan blurry and extremly bad quality
this image is 2,779 × 3,339 pixels, file size: 2.73 MB, it is a google scan of high quality.

Considering that there are plenty of images in art history choosing a black and white scan of a relatively unknown artist is not the best choice. Hafspajen (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

The motivation for removing this image was Artist is not well known. Ary Scheffer is not very well known either. If we want to stick to Ary Scheffer there is still a picture of much better quality, higher resolution, and in colour. Hafspajen (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC) The image I removed was 320 × 504 pixels, file size: 24 KB, scan blurry and extremly bad quality. The image I added - now removed - is 2,779 × 3,339 pixels, file size: 2.73 MB, it is a Google Art Project scan of high quality. Both illustrate about the same thing - a woman praying. Hafspajen (talk) 22:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't appreciate being accused of edit warring when I only reverted your edit once in good faith. I did not revert you repeatedly and you did not take the issue to the talk page until after I reverted you. I don't feel strongly enough about the lead image to get into an argument about. If there is a consensus to change the image then I have no objection. The black and white image has been in use for several years, however. -- HazhkTalk 00:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Could we consider File:Duerer-Prayer.jpg, below? It's a very simple and clear image depicting two hands clasped together. It symbolises prayer: "to ask earnestly, beg, entreat". I think it would avert any conflict over artistic style. It essentially depicts the same primary feature of the other pictures. -- HazhkTalk 05:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Another Mary Magdalene by Tintoretto
Wassilij Maximowitsch Maximow 002b.jpg
  • YES, it is great. Very good choice. Also added here another Mary Magdalene by Tintoretto, and some other depictions of prayer made by famous artist's. Let you chose if you want to use any of them. Hafspajen (talk) 10:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not convinced a large file size is necessarily an indication of quality. Personally I'd go with the Dürer image: A well-known artist and an image that focuses on the essentals: No landscape in the background, no allegorical accessories, no famous historical or mythological persons, just a gesture that (at least in Western Christianity) clearly symbolizes prayer. Huon (talk) 13:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I think it is the best choice for the lead. -- HazhkTalk 19:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I agree. The other ones can be used in the article . Or not. You decide. Hafspajen (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

"Pray to God"[edit]

The usage and primary topic of Pray to God is under discussion, see talk:Pray to God (song) -- (talk) 06:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Focusing on what Prayer is, and is not.[edit]

If we are to use the definition; “Prayer is the active effort to communicate with a deity or higher being”, then we must not use “chant, mantra, scripted recital, meditation or minnisveig” as forms of “prayer”. Confusing Prayer with superstitious behaviors like lighting candles, dance, kneeling and ringing bells is a disservice. --13:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Russell Williams (Chicago) (talk)

A "disservice" to whom? Our readers or people who pray without those behaviors?" Carptrash (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

This Page reads like a hit piece[edit]

I want to take a knife to several sections of this page. Prayer is a widespread aspect of many cultures, and has obvious significance in terms of (at least) history, anthropology, theology, etc. But much of this page reads like talking points for a debate about whether or not _intercessionary_ prayer is physically efficacious. That is an interesting question, and deserves mention here, but right now it is warping the article out of all proportion. Why are we discussing the Raëlians and Aztec human sacrifice on this page at all? This is presumably one of the A-list pages for theological topics, it seems like it we should treat it that way.EthanMitchellsNewAccount (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Prayer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)