Talk:Preki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bad dates[edit]

The section on what professional teams Preki has played for does not seem correct. It claims he started playing indoor soccer in 85, played for nine years until 92 (should be seven years?). Also the page does not clearly say what years he played for his other club teams so I have left them out of the info box. Rballou 15:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

I moved this back to Preki from his full name per the guideline WP:NCP. He is almost always referred to by his nickname, so that is what the article title should be. His full name should remain in the first sentence of the lead. Recury 20:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

move / feint[edit]

There is a move or feint nicknamed "the preki" or "full preki" and "half preki." These moves may go by other names but I've always assumed (not confirmed) the "preki" reference is for Predrag Radosavljevic. 192.88.165.35 15:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor[edit]

I'm not sure if this is a much bigger issue but there is absolutely NO WAY that indoor stats should be included with field stats, it completely blurs the overall totals of a player's career. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.244.223.186 (talk) 15:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Career in Portugal[edit]

I am strugling to find sources for his season in Portugal with top league side Estrela da Amadora in the 1987-88 season (6 app./0 goals). This is what I found by now: FutbolPlus.com. Anyway, in the next few days I´ll se if I can find more, and how to incorporate that info in the article and infobox. FkpCascais (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Preki Photo[edit]

The image of Preki is not very good. Can we use a full face photo such as this one at the link below? It is large but could be cropped smaller.

https://ussoccerplayers.com/images/2014/01/preki-Radosavljevic-usmnt-biography.jpg CryMeAnOcean (talk) 23:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CryMeAnOcean: Images of living people must be copyrighted with a compatible free license. SounderBruce 00:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: Thanks for the reply. It's easy for you to understand that, since you are a great photographer. :D