Talk:Preservation and restoration of automobiles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This page could use some work. I added some photos and a contents, but I am by no means a style expert. I think the whole article should be re-written with an emphasis on citing references and a more consistent, encyclopedic tone. Also, the catagories I added may need to be changed. Note that the exterior catagory is completely empty. I've added a few refs to this page, but it could use a whole lot more. If I find the time I might work on a rewite, but there are alot of other things on my to do list. If you have the time, I encourage anyone out there to take this task. Thanks. HornColumbia 18:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tuckerlt7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with citing sources![edit]

Hey everybody, I'm new to Wikipedia and I just made the most recent edits expanding the article on different styles of restoration/preservation. After making my changes I saw the citing error messages at the bottom in reference list for three sources. I have the URLs for sources #3 and #12 but not #8. Could I get some help correcting these errors? Not quite sure what they mean... Thanks in advance for any help!

Source #3 URL: https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/

Source #12 URL: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/autos/2004-09-15-fake-muscle-cars_x.htm

Tuckerlt7 (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Citing sources.
  • The simplest thing you can do is <ref>https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/</ref> at the end of each sentence that you're citing, after the period. A basic citation like this will probably be fixed up later by somebody else, but at least this gives us something to work with.
  • The next best thing is to give it a title <ref>[https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/ Learn Auction Terminology, Be a Step Ahead]</ref>
  • You can get more fancy by adding the author, date and publication: <ref>Barrett-Jackson (June 7, 2011). Barrett-Jackson Auction Company. [https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/ Learn Auction Terminology, Be a Step Ahead]</ref>
  • A near-perfect footnote uses the {{Citation}} template: <ref>{{Citation |url= https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/ |title= Learn Auction Terminology, Be a Step Ahead |author= Barrett-Jackson |date= June 7, 2011 |publisher= Barrett-Jackson Auction Company }}</ref>
With any of these, you can avoid redundancy by naming the reference <ref name=NameGoesHere>blah blah blah </ref>, for example
  • <ref name=Barrett-Jackson2011>{{Citation |url= https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Media/Home/Reader/learn-auction-terminology-be-a-step-ahead/ |title= Learn Auction Terminology, Be a Step Ahead |author= Barrett-Jackson |date= June 7, 2011 |publisher= Barrett-Jackson Auction Company }}</ref>
Then when you want to re-use it anywhere, you just put <ref name=Barrett-Jackson2011/> at the end of the sentence, after the punctuation.

New posts go at the bottom of the talk page, so this section will probably be moved down there. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV?[edit]

Not my area of expertise, but as someone who has dabbled with classic cars and so read around the topic a bit, I doubt that the very narrow definition of restoration used in this article is even the most commonly used one, let alone the only one. By the definition used here: "a car restored to the condition in which it was first sold", almost no car has ever been restored. Even for something like an MG Midget or a Triumph Spitfire where vast catalogues of parts are available, many of them are not the same as those used when the car was first built so their inevitable use as parts wear out apparently renders your car a non-restoration. Oddly, the article itself suggests the use of galvanised components, whose use would render the car "restomodded" in the terms of this article.

The answer of course is to find references and re-write the article (if necessary) in line with those. I don't really have any suitable sources, but surely such could be found? 4u1e (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

snobby[edit]

Honestly this article overall has a douchy feel to it, it should be deleted and written from scratch. 71.192.249.162 (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Feel free to re-write it in a non-douchy way. Thanks. HornColumbia talk 22:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Automotive restoration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conservation and restoration of automobiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]