Talk:Presidency University, Kolkata

Peer review by India project

I have completed the remaining steps of the peer review request. Please check here for comments.

Presidency College, Kolkata

Adding peer review request by User:Gamesmasterg9. -- Ganeshk (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comments

1. The lead section is very short.
2. The section on 'Recent history' can be widened to a large extent, also no mention of the controversy regarding UGC grants to the college and enhanced academic status.
3. Also the 'Departments' section links to the subjects in general and not college specific info.
4. 'Presy culture' is intimately linked with the hostels, yet only one line is devoted to the topic, this needs to be looked into.
5. Reference section should be introduced for verifiability of info.

You can take cue from other Featured Articles of the same type like Michigan State University, University of Michigan, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur etc.

LegalEagle 14:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. This can be revisited later when it is clear that the name change has actually occurred. Orlady (talk) 02:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Presidency College, Kolkata → Presidency University, Kolkata — The Presidency College Kolkata was reccently elevated to the status of a University, to reflect the changes it is essential to move the page. As the Presidency University already exist it is requested to move the page to Presidency University, Dhaka. Create a disambiguation page in Presidency University page Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

• Presidency University → Presidency University, Dhaka
• Oppose for now - Although the law was passed in March 2010, the actual establishing of the university is taking some tiime. According to the Times the university only formally came into existence on July 23, so we need to give time for the new name to become more used. The Telegraph says they have until October 7 to appoint the first vice-chancellor. The institution's own website still uses "Presidency College", so in my mind it is still a university on paper at the moment.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Banglapedia. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dana boomer (talk) 21:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism of this article

Please note that this page has been vandalised and contains many inaccuracies that amount to slander. Some of the references are to blogs and websites that put forward the opinions of some individuals. Please remove such controversial content and restore the objectivity that any encyclopaedia article should exhibit. This is an appeal to the Wikipedia Community. Please do not sully the reputation that Wikipedia is beginning to develop in Indian academic circles by allowing such unreliable information to be displayed.

One is not aware which member of the university administration has been contacted and if so what documentary proof of such contact has been established. Moreover, comments such as 'Hence all corruptions are tucked away under the cupboard' cannot be construed as anything but misinformation and as being written in a subjective style that does not befit an encyclopaedia article. Also, the comment, ' but funnily enough the university is only 4 years old, started in 2010 hence misguiding the larger illiterate population of India' is wrong as the although Presidency College has become a university recently, its academic traditions go back to the very outset of Western higher education in India. Once again, my appeal is to all Wikipedians to please refrain from such acts of misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souvikm1 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 25 November 2014‎ (UTC)

List of Principals

Re the note about who makes the list, I think that this is a case of WP:BIAS where all of the names should theoretically have articles per WP:NACADEMICS as leaders of a major educational institution and just our sources dont make that practically possible at this time. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.presiuniv.ac.in/web/presidency_history.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

"Soumen Sikdar" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Soumen Sikdar and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Soumen Sikdar until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)