Talk:Prevalence of rabies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Much of the information on prevalence is out of date as rabies has re-emerged in a number of places. Government health websites such as (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rabies-risks-by-country/rabies-risks-in-terrestrial-animals-by-country) could be useful in updating the information. Tables could be useful. Much of the country/region sections could also be streamlined. Bobpenguin (talk) 23:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal and Spain are also countries with a rabies-free status, and so the references in this article shows, however, the colored map shows that both countries have rabies, what is clearly a mistake.

Ref. 33 (Lumrix.net)[edit]

Following the link to this reference (http://www.lumrix.net/health/Rabies.html) reveals a webpage that says it is based on the Wikipedia article. Can Wikipedia use this link as a valid reference, as it sounds a little circular to me? Bonza9683 20:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonza9683 (talkcontribs)

2012 figures on Indian rabies death toll[edit]

See here 112.198.79.12 (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prevalence of rabies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prevalence of rabies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added section on mainland China[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I realized that there wasn't any information on rabies transmission and prevalence in China, so I did a bit of research on my own and added a section about that. It's surprising that nobody mentioned it, especially since China has one of the highest (total) rabies cases per year. The sources I cited contain additional information, if anyone wishes to expand upon it. Please let me know if this is adequate.

Oh, by the way - this is my school's institutional IP address. If you see vandalism coming from this IP, it's probably not me, but some of those knuckleheads. Please don't mind them.

03:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.77.18.2 (talk)


Isreal is listed under the Asia section[edit]

Just thought i'd point it out for someone to fix. I'm not good at editing. 163.47.239.17 (talk) 14:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rabies free+?[edit]

http://apps.who.int/neglected_diseases/ntddata/rabies/rabies.html SHOWS IT is Dog Free Rabies - this should be updated in the maps and article as wild rabies still exists in bats, foxes et cetera cf. polio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.204.102 (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Boom in Asia?[edit]

I tried finding a citation for this statement - "Another source of rabies in Asia is the pet boom" but was unable to find a reliable source. Please add citation. Blossiraptor (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: LLIB 1115 - Intro to Information Research[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sage1242 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sage1242 (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]